Tuesday, April 25, 2006

And the beat goes on...

Kaps posted about the recent controversy over Kaavya Vishawanathan's 'Opal'. I'm for one surprised how it was discovered so late and that too by the Harvard Crimson? Random House has rejected the author's apology that it was 'unintentional and unconcious'...c'mon give me a break!!! If anyone has seen the comparisons of the paragraphs (40 of them at the last count) no one in his sane mind will agree it was 'unintentional and unconcious'!!! I was quite intrigued by all this and headed to the Crimson webzine and found this article by Elizabeth Green (a staff writer on the Crimson).

A few excerpts follow:
A little-known fact about Harvard students is that we hate each other almost as much as the rest of the world hates us—maybe more. When one of us succeeds, the rest of us go berserk. Public congratulations barely conceal private disgust, which turns out to be an even poorer mask for deep, soul-burning jealousy and crippling self-doubt. The distance from “How could she...” to “Why didn’t I...” to “Undeserving slut” is, unfortunately, short and easily traveled.

The college ultimately fulfills all of Viswanathan’s heaven-on-Earth dreams. Viswanathan’s Harvard is a place where no one has to pretend, where competition dies, passion lives, and “social life” is something richer than binge-drinking on tabletops.

Viswanathan had a chance to debunk the Harvard myth for good. Instead, she perpetuates it. Given the market power with which DreamWorks seems to have endowed her, that is truly unfortunate. The overachieving girls and boys who flock to theaters to watch “Opal Mehta: The Movie” might learn that there is more to life than can be contained in a resume, but they’ll still leave the theaters convinced that an easy pill called Harvard exists. Finally, they’ll face a Catch-22: play into the system in order to get out of it, or reject the system only to remain trapped inside it.

And unfortunately—as the press keeps telling us—just like not everyone can publish a novel before the age of 20, not everyone can get into Harvard.
As for me, I would not go and buy this book for sure - its a movie made for the Amanda Bynes and Hillary Duffs - the Mickey Mouse club. My younger cousin might have read it, will ask her.

Update:
Came up with post at Hennessy's View where he dug up Kaavya's Harvard entrance essay.

From Kaavya Viswanathan:
If you really want to, like, hear about it, the first thing you'll probably want to know is where I was born in New Jersey, and what my lousy childhood was like, and how my immigrant parents were occupied before they had me, and all that Holden Caulfield kind of crap. But I'm going to go into that, if you want to know the truth. In the first place, that stuff bores me. In the second place, my parents would have about two hemorhages apiece if I told anything quite personal about them . . .

Actually, my childhood had its good point. It was the best of times, and it was the worst of times. It was a time when I was both wise and foolish. It was a period of belief and of incredulity. Juxtaposed were darkness and light.
Guess she has been 'internalising' stuff since beginning. Hahaha. Good one!

10 Comments:

Blogger Kaps said...

For all you know, this book might attain more popularity after the controversy. Her name was among the Technorati top 5 yesterday.

April 25, 2006 11:55 PM  
Blogger maverick said...

@Kaps: dude, as they say negative publicity is better publicity, remains etched in the mind!

April 26, 2006 12:12 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My comments are about your Profile, maverick. You say that you are in Bangalore, India. I assume you are Indian. And yet your 'Favorite Movies',
'Favorite Music' and 'Favorite Books' are all non-Indian. Why is that? Is it a legacy of British Colonialism, when Indians were told that their culture, their traditional educational systems, their values, their arts and sciences were 'inferior'? Are you trying to prove your 'sophistication' by identifying with those Western people and ideas that continue to want to shape the world on their terms? This is a new colonialism - the worst kind, since once the
mind is colonized, everything else is easy. Do not use the word 'globalization', since that's another trick word
used by Western countries to impose their vision of the world. (My question: WHOSE glaobalization, theirs, or ours?)
Indian civilization is not to be compared with two-bit countries like Britain and France and Germany.
Two thousand years ago, the peoples of these countries lived like savages, but nowadays they study the 'classics' (=Greek and Roman history and culture) as if THEY themselves were Greeks and Romans! they can't accept their lack
of civilization at that time, and they live vicariously in the (dead) shoes of (dead) Greek and Roman culture!
India should be truly proud of its true civilization. We have to remove the shackles of colonial thinking that continue to infect our educational system, which continues to churn out people worshipping others' 'modernity'.
We need our own modernity that we can throw in the face of the world. How about a world where someone works in a call-center in Arkansas, USA, who answers phone calls from India and speaks Hindi with an Allahabadi accent, and
surfs the Internet in the morning to pick up the latest gossip in India, so that he can chit-chat with the customer
on the phone, just as Indians (so degradingly) prepare for their call-centre jobs by inventing Western names for themselves and checking the USA sports or entertainment news, and take classes to lose their Indian accents?
Why don't we live in THAT world? Think about it.

April 26, 2006 9:01 AM  
Blogger Prerona said...

interesting

April 26, 2006 10:25 AM  
Blogger maverick said...

@anon: i assume from your tone that you are an Indian yourself. Let me just clarify something. A profile is painted with a collection of likes and dislikes. It wasn't filled so that you could like me or hate me. And liking what I like doesn't make me any less patriotic than you are. If just reading a few words on my profile gave you such a deep understanding of my person, all I can say is 'wow'! And just for the record, am not here blogging to prove anything. If you don't like what you see or even my profile, please move on to the next blog. No offense taken.

@prero: hey, howz u doin? how long u in cal?

April 26, 2006 2:13 PM  
Blogger Mr. D said...

Fuck man, how can someone combine Vernon God Little AND Holden Caulfield in one paragraph!!!! ugh.

April 27, 2006 9:15 AM  
Blogger maverick said...

@dibyo: :) gimme a buzz trow, wud be meeting up with T and Resh in the evening.

April 27, 2006 2:19 PM  
Blogger ? said...

interesting.

she is virtually a photocopy machine.

April 29, 2006 8:30 AM  
Blogger ? said...

and anonymous seems to need to join some political party like fast.

April 29, 2006 8:32 AM  
Blogger maverick said...

she is quite eh? now that her books been taken off the shelves in the US and the same to follow elsewhere, guess she needs to look for an alternative profession - she could make for a lawyer eh? ;)

April 29, 2006 9:20 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home